In physics, particularly quantum physics, there exists the idea that the consciousness of an observer creates or no less than influences exterior realities. As a result of physics is a longtime experimental science, one has to take a seat up and take note of the claims that this “Observer Impact” is in truth a longtime reality in its personal proper. Sadly, there aren’t any identified theoretical mechanisms than can account for this. But when this “Observer Impact” is so then it’s sturdy proof that we exist as virtual reality beings in a pc simulated panorama negozio virtuale.
THE BASIC PREMISE IN REVIEW
In each physics and in comparatively New Age philosophy, there exists the idea (established in physics – waffled about in philosophy) that the consciousness of an observer creates or no less than influences exterior realities. As a result of physics is a longtime experimental science, one has to take a seat up and take note of the claims that this “Observer Impact” is in truth a longtime reality in its personal proper. The 2 important experiments that help this “Observer Impact” are the Double-Slit Experiment the place waves stay waves until noticed wherein case waves flip into particles, and within the Quantum Zeno Impact the place observations can inhibit the decay of radioactive particles, apparently the one identified factor that may accomplish this bodily sleight-of-hand. Sadly, there aren’t any identified theoretical mechanisms than can account for this. But, regardless of this, the “Observer Impact” guidelines the roost, or no less than in quantum physics / mechanics it does.
MY BASIC PREMISE IN RESPONSE
Hogwash! I say there isn’t any “Observer Impact”; physicists say there may be an “Observer Impact” and have the experimental runs on the board to show it. If that is so it’s sturdy proof that we exist as virtual reality beings in a pc simulated panorama – that is the Simulation Speculation.
A SPOONFUL OF LOGIC
Premise: There aren’t any paradoxes, contradictions or inconsistencies ‘on the market’ in Mom Nature’s realm. Nature could be puzzling however she is not both malicious nor a joker. Mom Nature tells Her story like it’s with all of Her cards face up on the desk.
Premise: All paradoxes, contradictions or inconsistencies come up inside the thoughts. If one observes paradoxes, contradictions or inconsistencies ‘on the market’ in Mom Nature’s realm then they’re in the end a product of intelligence and never of nature.
Premise: There are various paradoxes, contradictions and inconsistencies noticed in Mom Nature’s realm.
Due to this fact: The game is afoot and intelligence is in operation.
oooooOOOOOooooo
Premise: Trendy physics acknowledges that there’s an “Observer Impact”.
Premise: The “Observer Impact” has been established as a reality by precise experiments together with the Double-Slit Experiment and the Quantum Zeno Impact.
Due to this fact: Observers observing one thing alters the state of affairs of that one thing.
oooooOOOOOooooo
Premise: Commentary can’t create reality. The idea that reality doesn’t exist in case you’re not trying is screwy*. If an observer can’t change reality within the Macro World then an observer can’t alter reality within the Micro World, and even within the realm that straddles the Macro and the Micro.
Premise: There’s experimental proof that statement determines reality, particularly inside the Micro (Quantum) World.
Due to this fact: Someplace is screwy someplace.
oooooOOOOOooooo
Premise: If we may create our personal reality by way of statement – thoughts over matter – our personal reality could be great – one of the best of all doable worlds!
Premise: Our personal reality is not one of the best of all doable worlds.
Due to this fact: We won’t create our personal model of reality simply by statement.
oooooOOOOOooooo
Premise: An observer is passive and sends no alerts or data that prods no matter it’s that’s being noticed.
Premise: Alerts or data travel from what’s being noticed to the observer.
Due to this fact: The observer is what’s being prodded by what’s being noticed, not the opposite means round.
oooooOOOOOooooo
Premise: What’s previous is previous and what’s occurred prior to now can’t be modified.
Premise: Any statement (by way of any of the 5 senses) is an statement (notion, consciousness, and so on.) of one thing that’s now prior to now tense (as a result of any sign has to travel at a finite pace) and subsequently can’t be altered.
Due to this fact: Any observer observing one thing can’t now alter the state of affairs of that one thing.
oooooOOOOOooooo
Premise: How individuals understand reality has no impact on the reality itself perceived.
Premise: That one’s notion of reality one way or the other has an impact on that reality itself is as logical a fallacy in logic as you might be ever prone to get.
Premise: Human consciousness can solely have a direct impact on the encircling atmosphere in case you invoke magic or some form of related supernatural or paranormal energy.
Premise: Some issues can’t be mounted irrespective of how a lot you would possibly will it to be in any other case.
Due to this fact: You can not bend reality to your will, or on a whim.
oooooOOOOOooooo
Premise: Any observer observing one thing can’t now alter the state of affairs of that one thing.
Premise: Observers observing one thing alters the state of affairs of that one thing.
Due to this fact: So, now we have a paradox, contradiction or inconsistency in that one thing can’t each be and never be. Due to this fact, to repeat myself, one thing is screwy someplace!
DISCUSSION
That is sufficient Premises and Therefores for now no less than. I believe you get the gist of the state of affairs – I hope.
The primary central concern right here is how can a passive observer impact or prod what’s being noticed, particularly within the micro realm of quantum or particle physics? What are the ‘bullets’ coming off or emanating from the observer and the way are these ‘bullets’ completely different from the remainder of Mom Nature’s ‘bullets’ which might be additionally current and accounted for however which appear to have no impact? Or, as some counsel, is an statement really an irreducible violent course of?
The second central concern is that if observers are random and observational behaviour is random why are experimental outcomes constant?
The third central concern right here is how can a particle or a wave KNOW or be AWARE that it’s being noticed?
The “Observer Impact” appears extremely selective (1): You get the “Observer Impact” within the Double-Slit Experiment that turns waves into particles whatever the ‘bullets’ used. Waves are by no means noticed to show into particles within the pure realm of Mom Nature. So now we have completely different guidelines for quasi-identical conditions, on this case observers and wave / particle behaviour.
The “Observer Impact” appears extremely selective (2): It exists inside the Quantum Zeno Impact however not in any other case. Now chances are you’ll nicely argue that folks observe radioactive stuff all the time, from medical technicians to particle physicists, from miners to producers of munitions, and there’s no change in charges of decay. And that is so. So now we have completely different guidelines for quasi-identical conditions, on this case observers and unstable (radioactive) nuclei.
So it could seem that simply being an observer is not fairly sufficient. You have to be an observer WITH INTENT. Your intention, your objective / goal is to change that fee of decay (and save Schrodinger’s Cat). This once more implies that one way or the other or different consciousness performs a key function in figuring out reality. Now I do not like that idea however I’m pressured to confront and think about that chance, a chance that many tens of millions already settle for as a given. That’s, you’ll be able to have mind-over-matter. The Placebo Impact is one of the best identified instance. You will have additionally heard of the phrase “the ability of constructive considering”.
EXPLANATIONS
Human Consciousness: It’s extremely straightforward simply to say consciousness and/or statement has a direct bearing on reality so long as you do not have to truly clarify how and what the precise mechanism is. You’ll be able to consciously observe a lead bar from now till you kick-the-bucket and it will not ever change right into a bar of gold even though in the end the lead bar is simply composed of micro realm particles.
So does consciousness clarify the “Observer Impact” and thus the Quantum Zeno Impact and the wave-particle duality inherent within the Double-Slit Experiment? In all probability not. First there’s the difficulty with mechanical gadgets as ‘observers’ doing the precise observations to which the property of consciousness just isn’t often attributed. Secondly, there is not any identified mechanism by which an immaterial thoughts can affect a cloth object (which isn’t to say it could possibly’t occur because the Placebo Impact adequately demonstrates). Lastly, every human observer is a unique human observer with a unique consciousness and collectively all have differing mind-sets. The consciousness of no two (or extra) individuals is similar but the experimental outcomes of the QZE and the DSE are uniform and constant.
God Carried out It: In fact theists say that the “Observer Impact” is simply the ever omni-presence of God. It is our supernatural God doing all the observing all the time of the entire Universe. The entire Universe maintains its existence in a non-superposition-of-state due to the existence of God who maintains the status-quo (i.e. – one Universe current and accounted for). And God works in mysterious methods! Nevertheless, what will be asserted with out proof will be rejected with out proof.
Particular Results! If there isn’t any “Observer Impact” (passive statement can’t affect what’s being noticed) then the Double-Slit Experiment (wave-particle duality) and the Quantum Zeno Impact (statement can alter radioactive decay) can’t be doable. But, each have been experimentally verified. One decision (i.e. – my decision) is to suggest that every one of that is just a few refined particular impact, the results of laptop software program programming. This suggests that we ‘exist’ as virtual reality in a simulated universe.
*The Moon exists even when nobody is it. The Moon continues to exist, undisturbed, even when no person is watching it. The Universe existed even earlier than the idea of observers was considered in Mom Nature’s philosophy. The Universe can create an observer however an observer can’t create the Universe. That is NOT a hen – egg situation. If quantum idea is unable to clarify this primary reality, it signifies that it’s, fairly merely, an incomplete idea.